It's hard to be anywhere this time of year without hearing something about the presidential election. From a marketing standpoint both (probable) candidates have used the past couple of years to intensify their efforts of brand establishment. McCain moreso than Obama due to an age gap, however, in terms of actually being President of the US, both candidates have marketed themselves heavily in what holds to be a very profound election in our time.
Who's done the better job? Well you might hear different answers dependent on political party affiliations, but all politics aside, I believe whomever is behind making the marketing decisions behind Obama's curtains is obviously in-tune with public demand.
The youthful exuberance that Obama's campaign emits is extremely bright. In a world where technology has created a paradigm shift in communication, the Obama campaign remains flexible and we adapted--understanding the magnitude that generational influence can play in November. Open communication, investment in education, our environment, technology, diversion from bullying tactics and a strategic, long-term approach to developing working relationships with global allies. THIS is exactly what the 78 million stong Gen Y class wants to hear and see from a President and leader of our nation.
"Maverick" is a term younger generations might easily see as rebellious and against the grain. While this might fly with a Baby Boomer (who showed those characteristics in the 60's and 70's), younger generations are team-oriented individuals who have learned to succeed with the help of those around them.
The argument can be made that Obama is a sexier option than McCain--and from a marketing standpoint this argument is extremely valid. However, there is substance too. For instance, I have yet to see McCain's party provide guidelines and strategy to solving some of the problems we face. Obama has advertised his plan for "change" openly.
Now that the election seems to be swinging in favor of the Democrats, the RNC has opted to more desparate strategy. I apologize in advance as this is not intended to be a political post, but I must say this: Palin was NOT picked for her decision making, knowledge or political expertise. She was picked purely for the fact that she's an attractive, youthful and energetic woman. It is a sad, sad America we live in today where a political party will place someone in a position where they could easily become the leader of our nation purely to try and superficially win votes. It's a sleazy marketing tactic in my mind that could potentially put our country, our people and our future in jeopardy.
In a world where image is everything--marketing yourself the right way to the right people is king. This election is no different--and Obama clearly has the edge across the board.
Who's done the better job? Well you might hear different answers dependent on political party affiliations, but all politics aside, I believe whomever is behind making the marketing decisions behind Obama's curtains is obviously in-tune with public demand.
The youthful exuberance that Obama's campaign emits is extremely bright. In a world where technology has created a paradigm shift in communication, the Obama campaign remains flexible and we adapted--understanding the magnitude that generational influence can play in November. Open communication, investment in education, our environment, technology, diversion from bullying tactics and a strategic, long-term approach to developing working relationships with global allies. THIS is exactly what the 78 million stong Gen Y class wants to hear and see from a President and leader of our nation.
"Maverick" is a term younger generations might easily see as rebellious and against the grain. While this might fly with a Baby Boomer (who showed those characteristics in the 60's and 70's), younger generations are team-oriented individuals who have learned to succeed with the help of those around them.
The argument can be made that Obama is a sexier option than McCain--and from a marketing standpoint this argument is extremely valid. However, there is substance too. For instance, I have yet to see McCain's party provide guidelines and strategy to solving some of the problems we face. Obama has advertised his plan for "change" openly.
Now that the election seems to be swinging in favor of the Democrats, the RNC has opted to more desparate strategy. I apologize in advance as this is not intended to be a political post, but I must say this: Palin was NOT picked for her decision making, knowledge or political expertise. She was picked purely for the fact that she's an attractive, youthful and energetic woman. It is a sad, sad America we live in today where a political party will place someone in a position where they could easily become the leader of our nation purely to try and superficially win votes. It's a sleazy marketing tactic in my mind that could potentially put our country, our people and our future in jeopardy.
In a world where image is everything--marketing yourself the right way to the right people is king. This election is no different--and Obama clearly has the edge across the board.